In the rush to explain ourselves, we opted for a different approach. These methods will vary from time to place, from occasion to person, from person to person, and many other factors can affect them. But honestly, we choose not to mention or mention our skills, talents, improvements, etc. Which do you think is a better choice? So which one do you support? “Give yourself up to find yourself. Spread the trap of humility and entrap love.” Mevlana “It’s not humility to underestimate yourself, it’s stupidity”?
First, I think we tend to confuse the concepts of humility and self-denial. Of course, to explain, I don’t support the idea of bragging myself most of the time, although I don’t think there’s anything to be gained by underestimating yourself. I mean, over the years, talking about ourselves has been viewed as a bad thing by multiple societies. After thinking about this concept myself, I finally realized that it is a relief for those who have not achieved anything meaningful in this world, because I have never seen anyone succeed and escape from being offended by others. Feel. Achievement.
I think Mevlana is also right. I mean, sometimes it’s more peaceful to keep silent and not have to explain your worth than to keep trying to explain yourself. Also, it’s no secret that those who love us without benefiting and knowing us are the ones who love us unconditionally. So maybe this is good advice if we want people to love us unconditionally.
In conclusion, I think both Mevlana and Montaigne make good arguments because they both do a lot of analysis and observation. While I agree with both of them, the statement I agree with the most is Montaigne’s statement about underestimating himself. The reason is because sometimes, especially in our social lives, I think we stand out a little more, we’re supposed to be aware of the importance of promoting ourselves, even if it seems wrong or weird to a lot of people, but At the end of the day, I believe this will benefit us 100%.