We define intelligent students who we meet at school in daily life and who are more successful than us. In my opinion, the wrong starts right here. He’s more successful than me. That doesn’t make him smart. Maybe I use my intelligence for different things rather than lessons, or I don’t prefer to use it for lessons. I don’t study as much as he does, I don’t read as much as he does. What about intelligence is it innate or is it based on environmental factors during adolescence?
I’m on the winning side of puberty. After a person is born, he tries to improve himself. No intelligence is born with exceptions. We can develop ourselves from scratch by going to the best schools and getting the best education during adolescence. We don’t need to get the best education in the best schools, we can achieve this by going to any public school and working hard enough. So how do we do this?
Let’s say we are in any public school. we took classes, came home and sat down for a while, after resting for a while, we solve tests about what we learned that day at school. Then we watch videos and we ask our parents what we don’t understand and public school does not provide better education than private schools.
For me, the secret of intelligence is to manage oneself well and to work hard. Of course, the environment is just as important as these. Bad teachers or bad family members. Even the absence of a suitable working environment is very important, in fact, we may think about what working with intelligence has to do with it. In my opinion, the absence of unnecessary information in the brain opens the mind, the collection of necessary information in the brain opens the mind, studying regularly, making a schedule, doing sports opens the mind.
As a result, intelligence is not innate, we can develop ourselves later. We should not say that anyone is smart, this can’t be stupid, according to his success, suitable environment and proper working order solves everything. Smart but according to whom?